After entering all the claims made by the marriage record and attached each claim to a subject and a claim type (see previous post), it was time to analyze my data.

Because I only had one document, and absolutely no other information about the people identified in the marriage record, this was surprisingly difficult for me. Since I had no conflicting evidence, analysis of the data would essentially consist of believing what the record told me.

First, I opened my Analyze Evidence screen and selected my subject and claim type:

analyze evidence choose

On the left are the claims I entered previously.  The center area is where I choose the quality of the evidence.  In this case, I chose “Direct” because each claim answers the question “When and where was William Warren wed?” (Wow, that’s a lot of Ws).

analyze evidence screen

In the right column is where I type my analysis of each claim, being sure to take into account the reliability of the information and the quality of the evidence.

Once I have entered my analysis of each claim, the dialog box will unlock so I can type my “soundly reasoned, clearly written conclusion.”

Conclusion - marriage

Now I’m ready to print my proof report.  I select “Reports” from the toolbar, then select the Marriage of William Warren from the drop-down menu:

report screen

I choose the font I’d like to use for my report, then click “Generate Report.”  Evidentia creates an HTML document incorporating all the steps I took to reach my conclusion.  Please note that I have copied and pasted my report into Word to edit some of the verbiage to conform with GPS, as Randy Seaver noted in the comments on Russ Worthington’s blog post here.

proof report

Clearly, I would continue to research this couple, the family, and the community in order to obtain more sources that could confirm or refute (or clarify) the claims made by the source I already have.

Now, to answer the bonus questions Myrt posed in her challenge:

1. What can we infer about Sarah solely using  information provided in this document?

The one thing we can infer is that she could neither read nor write. She signed the marriage record with an X, identified as her “mark.”   

2. What other questions about William are raised by this document?

Is he a bachelor?  What is his occupation?  How old is he (and how old is Sarah)?

3. What other record groups might we search for additional information about this members of this family unit?

I would consider starting with birth records and death records to try to put the family relationships in some perspective (census records aren’t available online earlier than 1841), and maybe more marriage records.

4. How can we determine we’re making a “reasonably exhaustive search”?

Because I am completely unfamiliar with English records, in order to do a reasonably exhaustive search, I would have to do some serious research on the geography, customs, and laws of the area, determine what records are available, determine whether William Warren or Sarah Bickle might have left a paper trail within those available records (including their “FAN club”), and then see if their records exist.  This would likely require quite a bit of offline research.

But wait!  There’s more to come …

Do we share ancestors? Email me: lostancestors AT gmail DOT com

Copyright 2016 - Jenny-ology.com

Disclosure:  Some posts may contain affiliate links, which means I may be compensated if you purchase a product using one of those links. There is no additional cost to you. Occasionally I receive free products to review, which will be indicated in my review posts. All opinions are my own, regardless of compensation.  See my full disclosures at the link above.


2013 Docu-Challenge #1: English Parish Register Marriage Entry – Part 2 — 2 Comments

  1. Based on some recent feedback I have received about the program I feel I need to point out that the line that currently says “2 sources were consider…” has been updated in the next release to indicate “2 assertions from 1 source were consider…”.

    The above citations were clearly from the same source (though the assertions as noted were different), and the regrettable error in wording may lead one to believe more sources support the final argument than have actually been considered.

    The next release will hopefully be available next week with many other enhancements as well and is free to all registered users of Evidentia.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *